fruglescot (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

AN IDEA FOR BETTER GOVERNANCE.. A BETTER WORLD'ALL' candidates aspiring for public office,especially at the highest levels, should be required to wear facial masks. Why not start voting for people with brains. Does this make any sense to American voters?

Signal337 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

A Great "Political Looser Of 2008" John McCain & Sarah Palin. "The National Republican Party" really did it this time."Sarah Palin"? , Everybody run away. This "Maverick" will make you loose any Political Election.

J4k0bM1 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

(continued) big deal. That is one of Fox News' slip ups for reporting this.

J4k0bM1 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

(continued) the people because that is how communism starts. If the government becomes oppresive, and God forbid that it does, we need to be able to overthrow it, and the infringement of the 2nd ammendment that is bound to come with the gun baning bills that congress has been trying to pass is the foundation for communism. Its no lie that obamas policies are socialist and i hate to say it, but socialism is clearly the foundation for communism. As for the story, I have no idea why this is a...

J4k0bM1 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Wow, her ignorance really shows. When people use the term "one of the folks," it means Sarah Palin can relate to, and understand the people of the United States very well. Her profanity isn't exactly making her look more inteligent either. When she says we need someone who is smarter, better, and more powerful than the people she make's it sound like we need a communist in office and trust me, that is NOT what the United States needs. We cant have a government that is more powerful than...

xsxrxvx (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

ya...i know what you mean. And how Obama made it threw the whole process without being asked any hard questions, he was a shew in by the liberal media. Which everyone knows is wrong 99.9% of the time.

MagnesDrachen13 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

If there's one thing learned in this election was that ANY criticism/explanation of Sarah Palin is automatically sexist. It's not accountability, it's not showing her as she actually is, it's not treating her like any other politician, it's sexist. See how dumb that sounds?

rabbitbear69 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

ok ok ok, photography enhances certain features and can hide others. with newsweek, they enhanced the awful, and accenentuated (sp?) the good. rolling stones gives obama a halo. newsweek gives her a dimple. there is no bias. i agree

RioMadeira (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Andrea Tantaros, please stifle yourself.

attofarad32 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

It is disgusting that trivial crap like this ever gets on the news. I guess it must be a cheap story to do, much cheaper than real news investigation and reporting. Puke.