|
lordshortcut (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
interesting.good job!!
bboy310 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
NERD. lol nA just joking, good vid
iceblitz99 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
though if you believe in god, god wouldnt even have to remove, or add mass Lmao he cud do it without even doing anything or even think or doing anything lmao.
bflagsst (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
for reals, is John A. Wheeler still alive? He's gotta be 100
wannabeebee (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
I don't believe in any of this.I think its fantasy.Its like black holes.Pure none existence.There are alternative theories
kutzicotl (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
thank you. very well done. Layman.
ernuchtern (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
lets get rid of this silly particle model nonsensethere is no such thing as a proton, electron, up quark, down quark, neutron, or hicks boson ( not discovered yet ) what the scientist should be saying is we have a point in space time ( or an area if you will ) that behaves like a proton model ( or has the characteristicsof a proton model ).
jonroy06 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
A single atom distort the space-time fabric. 2 atoms will distort twice as much, 10 atoms will distort it 10 times more and so a star (billions and billions and billions of atom) will distort it a lot.
levoslashx (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
My problem with the graviton is that it's a theoretical particle. It hasn't been proven, only thought up to explain something. On the other hand, the 2D space time bending seems to be a stretch for explanation as well. The truth seems to be, that we can predict gravity, but don't truly understand why it happens. Sure, we can make up a particle to explain it, but why not just make up a gravity god?
ya1138ya (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
No way.to catch such a wave you have to create it by vanishing of mass or adding a mass from no where (as God). but if you able to do so ,no need of tank of gas. just seat in your whatever something and sail away to... ( by the way why Mars? ) |
